On Sunday, December 07, 2008, at 09:59PM, "Bryan Blackburn" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >Before there are many more ports with such variants, we need to decide on a >standard name; I found that +64bit isn't liked by port as it thinks that is >the name of a port, not a variant so I guess it doesn't like a variant name >to start with a number.
Sounds like a bug to me. ;) Naming a variant with "use" seems redundant IMO, but it might be needed a temporary solution until we can name variants starting with numbers. Underscores can make it harder to remember, but otherwise I think +64bit would be the ideal choice. Chris _______________________________________________ macports-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/macports-dev
