On Wed, Dec 24, 2008 at 4:12 PM, Bryan Blackburn <[email protected]> wrote: > On Wed, Dec 24, 2008 at 03:40:17PM -0600, Ryan Schmidt said: >> >> On Dec 14, 2008, at 15:17, [email protected] wrote: >> >>> Revision: 43775 >>> http://trac.macports.org/changeset/43775 >>> Author: [email protected] >>> Date: 2008-12-14 13:17:09 -0800 (Sun, 14 Dec 2008) >>> Log Message: >>> ----------- >>> mpg123: platform 'powerpc' -> 'ppc' >>> >>> Modified Paths: >>> -------------- >>> trunk/dports/audio/mpg123/Portfile >>> >>> Modified: trunk/dports/audio/mpg123/Portfile >>> =================================================================== >>> --- trunk/dports/audio/mpg123/Portfile 2008-12-14 18:52:09 UTC (rev >>> 43774) >>> +++ trunk/dports/audio/mpg123/Portfile 2008-12-14 21:17:09 UTC (rev >>> 43775) >>> @@ -27,6 +27,6 @@ >>> configure.args-append --with-cpu=x86 >>> } >>> >>> -platform macosx powerpc { >>> +platform macosx ppc { >>> configure.args-append --with-cpu=altivec >>> } >> >> >> We have 60 occurrences of something like "platform powerpc" in the ports >> tree and only 8 occurrences of something like "platform ppc"...... Do both >> work? The Guide only shows "powerpc". > > port [1] and portmain [2] both convert "Power Macintosh" to powerpc, for > os_arch. Seems like powerpc is the one and those using ppc should be > changed. If there's some places where it will report ppc instead, shouldn't > we change that to powerpc as well? > > Bryan > > [1] - <http://trac.macports.org/browser/trunk/base/src/port/port.tcl#L1723> > [2] - > <http://trac.macports.org/browser/trunk/base/src/port1.0/portmain.tcl#L86> > > >> >> http://guide.macports.org/#reference.variants.platform >>
I suspect you'll find 'ppc' to be more intuitive to users, however. _______________________________________________ macports-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/macports-dev
