On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 05:29:00AM +0000, Eric Hall said: > On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 10:22:14PM -0700, Bryan Blackburn wrote: > > On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 05:08:09AM +0000, Eric Hall said: > [snip] > > > > > > I figured all of them, in case people want to use > > > the system installed X11. Perhaps I misunderstood something > > > in the various emails, I thought there was mention of having > > > variants to allow the use of the system installed X11. > > > > That's in the respective xorg-lib* ports, eg, xorg-libX11 [1]; so if > > port xyz depends on xorg-libX11, that either installs the library or, > > with +system_x11 set, nothing. > > > > Bryan > > > > [1] - > > <http://trac.macports.org/browser/trunk/dports/x11/xorg-libX11/Portfile#L45> > > > > Ahhhhh. So close and yet so far... > Much cleaner and nicer too (variant in one port rather > than in many many).
Actual, in several (30-some-odd xorg-lib* ports and a couple of other, similar ones), but at least grouped just to those X11-specific ports instead of having to go into any app-type port which needs X11... Bryan > > > -eric _______________________________________________ macports-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/macports-dev
