On Jan 31, 2009, at 11:10 AM, Nicolas Godbout wrote:
Hello,
As suggested in the MacPorts guide, I take the liberty to nudge
committers on the dev list to process updates for the following
ports following a 72 hour grace period:
port pcb : ticket #18172, submitted four days ago.
has been assigned to the listed maintainer, but is more than likely
abandoned. The current port version dates from almost four years ago.
While you're at it, you can process
port ng-spice: ticket #18208, submitted only two days ago, but still
has not been assigned at all. This is a 'nomaintainer' port and
could be processed immediately by any maintainer.
Sorry for leaning on the side of impatience, but I'm trying to
complete a list of ports for the whole gEDA (GPL's Electronic Design
Automation) suite and that's a total of about fifteen ports. Having
up-to-date ports for present portions of that suite would be really
helpful.
Actually, I'd like to have your opinion on this: the core gEDA
package consists of 10 ports that I already have working on my local
repository. Should I:
1) open 10 tickets, one for each port submission?
2) open 1 ticket with all port files and patches in a compressed file?
3) apply first as a port maintainer so that I can also commit all
these new packages?
Having recently gone through a similar process and having done steps
1, 2 and 3, I'd say go with 3. Stuff goes faster that way :-)
Your feedback on this would be appreciated.
With my salutations,
Nicolas.
__________________________________________________________________
Yahoo! Canada Toolbar: Search from anywhere on the web, and bookmark
your favourite sites. Download it now at
http://ca.toolbar.yahoo.com.
_______________________________________________
macports-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/macports-dev
_______________________________________________
macports-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/macports-dev
