To clarify, the fact that "port lint" has something to say doesn't
automatically mean there's a bug in the portfile. It could instead
mean there is a bug in lint.
In this case, however, lint is right and something should be done to
the port. The least intrusive thing to do is to move the port to the
correct directory, and keep the port name as it is.
DPORTS=http://svn.macosforge.org/repository/macports/trunk/dports
svn mv $DPORTS/{graphics/exiftool,perl/p5-image-exiftool}
On Mar 6, 2009, at 21:48, Jeremy Lavergne wrote:
port lint --nitpick p5-image-exiftool
---> Verifying Portfile for p5-image-exiftool
Warning: Line 5 should be a newline (after PortGroup)
Error: Portfile parent directory graphics does not match primary
category perl
Error: Portfile directory exiftool does not match port name p5-
image-exiftool
---> 2 errors and 1 warnings found.
So that'd be a bug.
On Mar 6, 2009, at 10:45 PM, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
There's somthing strange:
$ port cat p5-image-exiftool
# $Id: Portfile 38454 2008-07-21 13:51:06Z [email protected] $
PortSystem 1.0
PortGroup perl5 1.0
perl5.setup Image-ExifTool 7.37
maintainers blair openmaintainer
description Perl interface to EXIF metadata
long_description ${description}
platforms darwin
checksums md5 9e214b3eba4ae3f1eadc4370da6cad70
homepage http://www.sno.phy.queensu.ca/~phil/exiftool/
master_sites ${homepage}
depends_lib port:p5-digest-md5 \
port:p5-compress-zlib
but this port is in graphics/exiftool! This is really misleading.
Is this a bug?
_______________________________________________
macports-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/macports-dev
