On Mar 10, 2009, at 03:57, [email protected] wrote:
Revision: 47923
http://trac.macports.org/changeset/47923
Author: [email protected]
Date: 2009-03-10 01:57:06 -0700 (Tue, 10 Mar 2009)
Log Message:
-----------
Version bump to 5.17.1.
Modified Paths:
--------------
trunk/dports/math/maxima/Portfile
Modified: trunk/dports/math/maxima/Portfile
===================================================================
--- trunk/dports/math/maxima/Portfile 2009-03-10 08:52:31 UTC (rev
47922)
+++ trunk/dports/math/maxima/Portfile 2009-03-10 08:57:06 UTC (rev
47923)
@@ -4,7 +4,7 @@
PortSystem 1.0
name maxima
-version 5.17.0
+version 5.17.1
categories math
maintainers nomaintainer
platforms darwin
@@ -32,10 +32,11 @@
homepage http://maxima.sourceforge.net/
master_sites sourceforge
-checksums md5 98ec3ec237d55639a8de5b317990eb2d \
- sha1 7013221504c4f8e915d2f69349c37bad25d58635 \
- rmd160 ea7227e39019505b945caa7257050ecaa58b14e2
+checksums md5 f49e7b978061a63423b0d486240d281e \
+ sha1 0f87f2fbf3c91cd54528cfc355ddf5ed30ee66ac \
+ rmd160 0738ddd1f8247ae0300b5810fa21db1fbfc608c3
+
depends_lib port:sbcl
depends_run port:tk \
port:recode \
@@ -60,7 +61,7 @@
}
variant printable_doc description {Build printable documentation} {
- depends_build-append bin:tex:texlive
+ depends_build-append port:texlive
build.target all pdf
pre-destroot {
Why change "bin:tex:texlive" to "port:texlive"? I thought it had been
decided some months ago by those who know about texlive that
"bin:tex:texlive" was the preferred syntax because it allows an
external texlive to be used which is desirable because the MacPorts
version of texlive was deficient in some way.
_______________________________________________
macports-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/macports-dev
