On Mar 23, 2009, at 3:50 PM, Anders F Björklund wrote:
[...]
We could also resume building RPMS, if someone wants to spend
some time on that. The build script could probably produce both
archives and packages in the same run, from the same destroot.


RPM may be appealing to many for various reasons and I won't argue that.

Apple has created the package format for distributing binaries and it is familiar to most users and does not require any additional software be installed.

If macports binaries were packaged in osx package format wouldn't that be more native and there by more attractive then rpms?


//Brad
_______________________________________________
macports-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/macports-dev

Reply via email to