On Mar 27, 2009, at 01:25, Allen McBride wrote:
As I've written at
http://trac.macports.org/ticket/18870
I made a mistake in my portfile for solfege. For a silly reason, I
didn't realize that Mac users, in order to use Solfege, needed to
install an external MIDI player and then point Solfege at that
player in its preferences, once it's running. Therefore I think I
should add qtplay as a runtime dependency for solfege. I'm working
with the author to make it so that Solfege will default to the
correct settings if it's being built on a Mac. In the meantime,
I'm thinking I should submit a new portfile with the following
changes:
1) Include qtplay as a runtime dependency
2) Include the following (I copied the ui_msg thing from python26):
post-activate {
ui_msg "\nAfter starting Solfege for the first time, select\
File->Preferences. \nUnder the External Programs tab, under the
subheading\
Audio File \nPlayers, enter \"qtplay\" in the field labeled \"MIDI:
\".\
Under the \nSound Setup tab, select \"Use external MIDI player\".\n"
}
3) Include "revision 1"
Does this seem like the right course of action? I could also just
wait until I get everything ironed out so that users don't have to
mess with preferences at all. But I hate to think of users being
frustrated with the error message that Rainer told me about on the
ticket. I guess I don't have any idea how many MacPorts fans are
likely to install a yet-unadvertised, minor port like solfege in
the next week or two. Could be zero or fifty, for all I know.
Those changes sound good to me!
_______________________________________________
macports-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/macports-dev