Now that the very useful change of reversing @INC has been made r48955,
will there be a rule of thumb for p5 dependencies already provided by perl5?
Option 1: Only have the dependency if the newer version is needed.
Option 2: If the package is needed, included it as a dependency even if the
base package is sufficient.
Option 3: No rule of thumb on this matter.
I would personally be in favor of Option 1 since it would lead to fewer
surprises
for users.
As much as possible, the packages requested by the user is the one provided
by the base perl5.
-Marcus
_______________________________________________
macports-dev mailing list
macports-dev@lists.macosforge.org
http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/macports-dev
