On Apr 11, 2009, at 09:12, C. Florian Ebeling wrote:
I yesterday threw together a RubySection page in the wiki. Now I
wanted to hear thoughts if we should add one for every group of ports
where we have some implicit policy of how to add ports and if you like
the idea at all.
I think of them to state how ports are handled in a certain
special-interest section: wether to add them at all or rather use
package managers (like gem, eggs, pear, cpan) and point users there,
who the interested maintainers for a certain section are, and other
topics which would fit here.
Whether to add ports at all: I think the answer for all ports if you
want to be able to declare something as a dependency of another port,
then you need it to be a port.
Who the maintainers are: I think that's adequately covered by the
maintainers field in each Portfile.
_______________________________________________
macports-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/macports-dev
