On 2009-06-05 01:22, Scott Haneda wrote: > A few of those are done already. Is closing #126 just a matter of > splitting the above ports into two, and having on depend on the other > with a startup item in it? That ticket is 7 years old, if the list > above is all it takes to close it, maybe I can find a weekend
No, splitting those ports is a workaround which is applicable in the +server case. But it is on no means a solution for #126. Rainer _______________________________________________ macports-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/macports-dev
