On 19.6.2009, at 1.28, David Evans wrote:
nox wrote:
libgda should be updated instead, I have a local diff which I need
to file on Trac.
Le 18 juin 09 à 21:39, [email protected] a écrit :
<snip>
I agree that it would be good to update libgda itself to version 4
but this should be done with caution. It is not clear that all the
current dependents of
libgda are compatible with libgda-4.0 and this should be addressed
before any further changes are made.
As it is libgda and libgda3/4 do not interfere with each other so
the libgda dependents should not be effected by the recent changes.
I suggest that libgda3 be deleted after the midgard2-core port has
been updated to libgda4, then address the potential merging of
libgda and libgda4 as a separate project in a way that existing
ports are not broken unnecessarily.
Dave
Ok,
I checked the situation from (reliable) sources. For the time being
midgard2-core needs libgda3 (the information is that gda4 still
doesn't support e.g. table creation, also database provider set is not
quite stable). So let's not drop it yet:-) I expect that midgard2-core
will move to gda4 in future, but it is not there now.
!
! Jyrki Wahlstedt
! http://www.wahlstedt.fi/jyrki/
!
! Our life is no dream; but it ought to become one and perhaps will.
! PGP key ID: 0x139CC386 fingerprint: F355 B46F 026C B8C1 89C0 A780
6366 EFD9 139C C386
_______________________________________________
macports-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/macports-dev
