On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 14:28, Jeremy Lavergne <[email protected]> wrote: >> I don't think you're understanding me at all. If a project updates its >> config.guess and things work fine with the new output, that's fine. >> However, changing MacPorts base would have many unexpected effects >> that we'd be better off avoiding. >> >> Furthermore, I can say with a straight face that's it's ok for >> config.guess to return whatever it wants, because it usually makes no >> difference. It does for some ports, but not for most. > > It sounds like the change does nothing more than allow for 64bit to be built > correctly on the 32bit kernel of SL. > > Is that a good summary for what's going on?
For the third time, the kernel architecture has absolutely nothing to do with this, as 'uname -p' returns i386 for both K32 and K64. - Toby _______________________________________________ macports-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/macports-dev
