--On September 15, 2009 5:18:32 PM -0700 Toby Peterson
<[email protected]> wrote:
On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 17:05, Mike Alexander <[email protected]> wrote:
--On September 15, 2009 4:01:43 PM -0700 Toby Peterson
<[email protected]> wrote:
For the few ports that actually care, only --build makes any sense.
We don't support cross-compiling, and very few configure scripts
get it right anyway.
I think Jack's point is that in 10.6 on a 32 bit kernel you
effectively are cross-compiling whether you want to or not. You're
building 64 bit binaries on a system that claims to be a 32 bit
system. That seems like cross-compiling to me. Am I
misunderstanding something?
As I've noted numerous times now, config.guess still reports i386 on
K64, so this perceived problem exists regardless of the kernel
architecture.
Ok, that just seems to make the problem worse. Even after switching to
the 64 bit kernel you're still cross-compiling, right?
Mike
_______________________________________________
macports-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/macports-dev
