On Sep 16, 2009, at 10:53 AM, Jack Howarth wrote:
On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 10:16:48AM -0400, Daniel J. Luke wrote:
... so relatively few ports, then?
The proposed change to config.guess only effects the
case where the architecture detected by 'uname -p' is
i386.
sure, but MacPorts base doesn't need to force this on every port...
(It sounds like a good change to config.guess, but it also sound like
MacPorts doesn't really need to do anything generally wrt that change).
--
Daniel J. Luke
+========================================================+
| *---------------- [email protected] ----------------* |
| *-------------- http://www.geeklair.net -------------* |
+========================================================+
| Opinions expressed are mine and do not necessarily |
| reflect the opinions of my employer. |
+========================================================+
_______________________________________________
macports-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/macports-dev
