Jack Howarth wrote:
does that make more sense?
Not really (don't think I'd change --build but --target), but then again Fink (or RPM) can do stuff their way... It is my understanding that neither Apple nor MacPorts is going to change the way they do arch/uname/config. And I think cross-compilation is neat when compiling to MinGW (Windows) or to Linux, but probably overkill just for building some 64-bit binaries for regular Mac OS X - whether they are thin/1 or fat/2 or obese/4 binaries ? --anders _______________________________________________ macports-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/macports-dev
