Very good idea.
Having a historian of sorts to show the ropes, fix any messes, etc.
On Oct 9, 2009, at 6:09 PM, Daniel J. Luke wrote:
It might be a good idea to agree on a term and then also stage
things so that we don't end up with the possibility of 100% turnover
each election.
On Oct 9, 2009, at 3:39 PM, Jeremy Lavergne wrote:
Also, are we sticking to the same number of people?
On Oct 9, 2009, at 2:12 AM, Bryan Blackburn wrote:
The questions are, then, how do we want to do this, when, and
after that's
decided, who wants to run?
--
Daniel J. Luke
+========================================================+
| *---------------- [email protected] ----------------* |
| *-------------- http://www.geeklair.net -------------* |
+========================================================+
| Opinions expressed are mine and do not necessarily |
| reflect the opinions of my employer. |
+========================================================+
_______________________________________________
macports-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/macports-dev
