On 2009-10-11 22:44 , Jack Howarth wrote: > Am I correct in assuming that it is best practices to > construct packaging that builds against python25 or python26 > without requiring the associated python to be activated? > I believe the current pymol packaging should now build > regardless of the activation state of python26 with the above > change.
Any file in the prefix comes from an active port. Inactive ports are "invisible" and cannot be used from other ports. See <http://guide.macports.org/#internals.images> Rainer _______________________________________________ macports-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/macports-dev
