On Mar 21, 2010, at 00:03, [email protected] wrote: > Revision: 65076 > http://trac.macports.org/changeset/65076 > Author: [email protected] > Date: 2010-03-20 22:03:24 -0700 (Sat, 20 Mar 2010) > Log Message: > ----------- > port1.0: Use setpriority(2) in proc system instead of /usr/bin/nice, fixes > #18304
Oooh. Very fancy! I like it. Do you suppose it would be nice to use setpriority in other phases as well? There are some ports that, though perhaps they shouldn't, compile in either the configure or destroot phases; perhaps they should use lower priority then too. Even ports that don't do this will sometimes do a lot of work in the configure phase, which can eat into CPU time. _______________________________________________ macports-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/macports-dev
