I've made that too, for ports like hs-Diff.
Le 19 mars 2010 à 14:24, Ryan Schmidt a écrit :
> On Mar 19, 2010, at 08:22, Gregory Wright wrote:
>> On 3/19/10 9:00 AM, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
>>>
>>> The lint message in question reads:
>>>
>>> Error: Portfile directory hs-NewBinary does not match port name hs-newbinary
>>>
>>> The haskell portgroup deliberately lowercases the supplied haskell module
>>> name:
>>>
>>> name hs-[string tolower ${package}]
>>>
>>> So why are you defeating that in the ports you've been adding? If we want
>>> lowercase portnames, as this convenience in the portgroup suggests, you
>>> should not be defeating it in your ports. OTOH if we want CamelCase
>>> portnames, then the lowercasing convenience should be removed from the
>>> portgroup.
>>
>> Here's the problem: the hackage package distribution site lowercases
>> distfiles,
>> so the distfile of the HTTP port is http-<version>.tar.gz. However, they
>> allow
>> mixed case package names. So for the port name to agree with the common
>> name, we
>> need mixed case. The fix would seem to be to lowercase only the distfile
>> name.
>
> When Brian designed the haskell portgroup, he appears to have intended for
> the portname to be lowercased, presumably to match how we do perl module
> ports. (Perl module names are mixed-case, but the corresponding portnames are
> lowercased.)
>
> You are now adding ports with mixed-case names.
>
> We can do it either way, I'd just like us to be consistent, and for the
> portgroup to encode that behavior.
>
> _______________________________________________
> macports-dev mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/macports-dev
_______________________________________________
macports-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/macports-dev
