As the maintainer of the port, you should say whether or not the patch should 
be committed.

On Jun 4, 2010, at 13:10, Daniel wrote:

> do I need to take any action on this?
> 
> On Fri, Jun 4, 2010 at 12:38 AM, MacPorts <[email protected]> wrote:
> #25127: Brings Pidgin to 2.7.1
> -------------------------------+--------------------------------------------
>  Reporter:  jema...@…          |       Owner:  ne...@…
>     Type:  update             |      Status:  new
>  Priority:  Normal             |   Milestone:
> Component:  ports              |     Version:
>  Keywords:  haspatch           |        Port:  pidgin
> -------------------------------+--------------------------------------------
> Changes (by j...@…):
> 
>  * cc: ne...@… (removed)
>  * keywords:  => haspatch
>  * version:  1.8.2 =>
>  * owner:  macports-tick...@… => ne...@…
> 
> 
> --
> Ticket URL: <http://trac.macports.org/ticket/25127#comment:1>
> MacPorts <http://www.macports.org/>
> Ports system for Mac OS


_______________________________________________
macports-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/macports-dev

Reply via email to