On Fri, Jun 04, 2010 at 02:49:08PM -0500, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
> > Perhaps we should have a generic "tex" metaport that could be satisfied
> > by any TeX distribution? We have a teTeX port that could conceivably be
> > used instead, although teTeX is now obsolete so anyone still using it
> > is probably doing something wrong.
> 
> A tex metaport might be an even better idea. We would then need to update all 
> TeX-using ports to use this metaport, but that's not a terribly big deal; 
> after all, we've already had to do it once when we switched from tetex to 
> texlive. The tex metaport could have variants for MacTeX and TeX Live and 
> intelligently select the default variant based on whether MacTeX is already 
> installed.

I think this is probably the way to go, so I'll put it on my queue to
go along with the TeXLive update.

It would also make things a lot easier if some new TeX distribution
comes into the picture in the future, like when TeXLive replaced teTeX.

> I've been hearing about teTeX's obsolescence for awhile; should it just be 
> removed?

Probably -- it hasn't been updated since 2006 and I can't think of any
reason someone would want to still be using it.

Dan

-- 
Dan R. K. Ports              MIT CSAIL                http://drkp.net/
_______________________________________________
macports-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/macports-dev

Reply via email to