OK; I'm going to take over qt4-mac and -devel, and update them per my and your comments .. and we'll see what happens :)
On Thu, 17 Jun 2010 22:29 -0500, "Ryan Schmidt" <[email protected]> wrote: > On Jun 17, 2010, at 22:02, Michael Dickens wrote: > > > * Looking quickly at the Portfiles for qt4-mac and qt4-mac-devel, I see > > not significant differences between them & the patch files. Anyone know > > why the latter exists? It's difficult enough to keep up the regular > > Portfile for the non-devel version (and, qt4-mac is actually ahead in > > version number). > > qt4-mac-devel is for the latest development version of qt4-mac. Currently > it is more or less equivalent to qt4-mac, but ideally someone would > update qt4-mac-devel to a beta of 4.7. > > > * Anyone know why both qt4-mac and qt4-mac-devel are built as "release > > and debug" combined? Could we make a variant "+debug" which installs > > the combined version, but with the default being just the release? I > > think there are many of us who are not Qt developers needing debug > > libraries, and having just the release will be enough. With this > > variant, those who wish to do developing have that option. > > I don't know. Perhaps having it be a debug build helps MacPorts > developers when users report Qt-related bugs. > > > * Anyone know why the pkg-config .pc files for qt4-mac are all of the > > "debug" variety? Why not include the regular by default, the debug when > > using the "+debug" variant? > > I don't know. _______________________________________________ macports-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/macports-dev
