Jeremy Lavergne wrote:

I think MacPort is mainly for user programs and libraries. Admin tools such as daemons and OS maintenance (such as stuff in /bin and /sbin) should have already been in the OS X itself rather than in
MacPort.

The packages in the `aqua` category are the only ones in MacPorts that meet the .app qualifications. Not surprisingly, they're installed into the /Applications folder by default.

Actually, that *is* rather surprising. The logical place would be to have them in ${prefix}/Applications, just like the frameworks were changed to use ${prefix}/Library (rather than /Library). But it was something hardcoded in the OS that made the subdirectory / Applications/MacPorts a better default... (and no idea why it couldn't just be a symlink)

It would be better/easier to have everything under ${prefix}, instead of installed into 4 possibly different locations (prefix, tclpackage, applications, frameworks). Ignoring system ports that actually need to install things elsewhere, that is (startup scripts, kernel modules, etc). That way, you would only have one toplevel folder to deal with...

--anders

_______________________________________________
macports-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/macports-dev

Reply via email to