On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 04:33, Michael Dickens <[email protected]> wrote:
> Thank you, Michael. I hadn't found that one yet in a quick search. I like > that it's based on Apple's GCC42 & thus doesn't have the potential issues > we've been talking about when using different GCC versions; seems like it's > worth considering for compatibility reasons as a variant on the various math > ports that require fortran. Definitely, I do however have one concern. I recall Atlas having problems when built on newer hardware (i7) with anything less than gcc44... I don't have access to one of these machine so am unable to test. > Anyone know if a more recent GCC (43, 44, 45) produce "better" binaries -- > smaller, faster, whatever, that make it desirable to use the more recent GCC > over an older one? IDK. - MLD Cheers Adam _______________________________________________ macports-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/macports-dev
