> No, existing use of md5 will continue to work for a long time. Using md5 > isn't a problem, not using anything else is. Using md5 alone should > probably become an error in a future version. OK
> The "correct checksum line may be" message when the checksums don't > match just uses whatever types are defined in the portfile, unless there > are none, in which case it suggests two default types, neither of which > is md5. I see. Since the ports in question had two checksums neither of which was md5 as a consequence md5 was suggested by port. ;-) _______________________________________________ macports-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/macports-dev
