On Jun 29, 2011, at 7:18 AM, Vincent Lefevre wrote: > Perhaps I could try qt and fltk, as there are ports for them. > I don't know whether PARI has been tested with them under Mac OS X. > Do you have any information about their quality?
See below. > For the description of x11, I could say: > > Build with X11 support for the high-resolution plotting functions Yeah, that sounds good. ditto for qt and fltk if they work. > If qt and/or fltk variants are possible, should there be a default > variant? I would argue that there should be no default variant for the plotting. I used pari extensively in college cryptography and never used the plotting feature once. I'm sure others have no need for it as well. The GUI libraries are a lot to pull in for a feature that won't be used often. If someone needs it, they probably have the variant set. --Jeremy _______________________________________________ macports-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/macports-dev
