On Jul 4, 2011, at 11:16, Blair Zajac wrote: > On Jul 4, 2011, at 11:14 AM, Jeremy Huddleston wrote: >> >> All of the ports that are in my install-set (including many multimedia >> ports, x11, firefox, gnome, with most bloat variants set) have been working >> with trunk/base using llvm-gcc-4.2 on SL and Lion for a while now >> (trunk/base now chooses the compiler based on devtools version rather than >> os version). I'm still holding on to a couple NDA-squimish patches in leaf >> projects that I'll push after the actual release, but it mostly works out of >> the box. >> >> If you are uncertain if filing your bug would violate your NDA, please feel >> free to email me directly. > > Out of curiosity, Apple hasn't bumped to a newer gcc version? Does anybody > know why? Did they stick with 4.2 for compatibility for libstdc++?
gcc-4.2 was Leopard's preferred compiler. It was replaced with llvm-gcc as the preferred compiler in Snow Leopard. If you want to know about Lion, you can watch the WWDC talks if you have an ADC account. --Jeremy _______________________________________________ macports-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/macports-dev
