On 07/21/2011 07:40 PM, Marko Käning wrote:
I just re-read the first paragraph quoted above. I think previously I just read "There are
still many people using KDE3 applications" and took this to mean that we should keep KDE3 in
MacPorts. But now I read "Since KDE3 and KDE4 can't coexist, I wouldn't like to see a KDE3
port intentionally eradicated" implying we should not keep KDE3 in MacPorts. So which is it?
Oh, no we DO NOT WANT TO ERADICATE KDE3, by no means!!!!
KDE4 has still a lot of trouble and I'd not advise to get rid of KDE3 at all.
Many users seem to have the same concern which is why the Trinity
Desktop Environment (TDE) was started. It is a fork of KDE 3.5.10 and
tries to keep the style of KDE3 alive. As it is not officially supported
by the KDE project, they renamed to Trinity.
http://trinitydesktop.org
Maybe it would be worth a try to port this instead of keeping KDE3?
Rainer
_______________________________________________
macports-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/macports-dev
