On Jul 30, 2011, at 11:56 PM, Ryan Schmidt wrote: > > On Jul 31, 2011, at 01:36, [email protected] wrote: > >> Revision: 81459 >> http://trac.macports.org/changeset/81459 >> Author: [email protected] >> Date: 2011-07-30 23:36:16 -0700 (Sat, 30 Jul 2011) >> Log Message: >> ----------- >> fuse4x: install library as libfuse.dylib rather than >> libfuse4x.dylib. The port conflicts with macfuse anyway, so there's no >> need to keep them separate, and this will make it easier for dependent >> ports to find the library. > > > ...until those ports start jumping on the fuse4x bandwagon and start looking > for it by that name, right? :)
Make a libfuse.dylib --> libfuse4x.dylib simlink? Regards, Bradley Giesbrecht (pixilla) _______________________________________________ macports-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/macports-dev
