On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 21:33, Anders F Björklund <[email protected]> wrote: > But the name of the wxWidgets license is "wxWindows"... > (or wxWindows Library Licence, Version 3.1 to be specific)
> There is no conflict between the lgpl-2+ (of wxWindows), > and the gpl-2 (I'm not sure if anything uses gpl-1 only). Since wxWindows Library Licence "is essentially the L-GPL" I assumed it had the same conflicts as 'lgpl' . > So I have no idea what "wxwidgets" and "lgpl-3" was about. Apache's license is actually "Apache License", still it's present as "apache" in port_binary_distributable.tcl, if capitalization matters why is this? Because I mistakenly understood that wxWindows Library Licence was bases on L-GPL 3, now I see it's based on version 2. > Or why you bothered asking, if going to commit anyway ? I got your previous reply as a clear to send. I was eager to add the license as Jeremy asked to keep the license db consistent and I filed a ticket to upgrade wxwidgets-devel. Is there anything wrong apart the lgpl-3 bit? > --anders -- Andrea _______________________________________________ macports-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/macports-dev
