On Nov 16, 2011, at 12:23, [email protected] wrote:

> Revision: 87295
>          http://trac.macports.org/changeset/87295
> Author:   [email protected]
> Date:     2011-11-16 10:23:45 -0800 (Wed, 16 Nov 2011)
> Log Message:
> -----------
> new port, at 5.0.1

Remember to begin your commit message with the port name.


> Added Paths:
> -----------
>    trunk/dports/databases/libgda5/
>    trunk/dports/databases/libgda5/Portfile


> +if (![variant_isset without_bdb]) {
> +    if !([file exists ${prefix}/include/db46/db.h]) {
> +        depends_lib-append port:db47
> +    } elseif ([file exists ${prefix}/include/db47/db.h])  {
> +        depends_lib-append port:db47
> +    } else {
> +        depends_lib-append port:db46
> +    }
> +}

I'm surprised this works syntactically; I've never seen parentheses used in Tcl 
in "if" statements. Everywhere else, we use curly braces.

I'm also not sure it's a good idea to vary the port's behavior based on what's 
already installed on the user's system; that's something we usually avoid. It's 
not like BerkeleyDB is a huge dependency that would take a long time to build 
or take a lot of disk space. Why not just unconditionally depend on the latest 
version that will work? The latest we have in MacPorts is db52.


> +variant with_mysql5 \
> +    description {support for current MySQL 5.x} {
> +     depends_lib-append      path:bin/mysql_config5:mysql5
> +     configure.env-append    \
> +             MYSQL_CONFIG=${prefix}/lib/mysql5/bin/mysql_config
> +     configure.args-delete   --without-mysql
> +     configure.args-append   --with-mysql=${prefix}/lib/mysql5
> +     configure.cppflags-append       "-I${prefix}/include/mysql5/mysql"
> +}
> +
> +variant with_postgresql83 conflicts with_postgresql84 with_postgresql90 \
> +    description {support for PostgreSQL 8.3.x} {
> +     configure.cppflags-append       "-I${prefix}/include/postgresql83"
> +     depends_lib-append      port:postgresql83
> +     configure.args-delete   --without-postgres
> +     configure.args-append   --with-postgres=${prefix}/lib/postgresql83
> +}
> +
> +variant with_postgresql84 conflicts with_postgresql83 with_postgresql90 \
> +    description {support for PostgreSQL 8.4.x} {
> +     configure.cppflags-append       "-I${prefix}/include/postgresql84"
> +     depends_lib-append      port:postgresql84
> +     configure.args-delete   --without-postgres
> +     configure.args-append   --with-postgres=${prefix}/lib/postgresql84
> +}
> +
> +variant with_postgresql90 conflicts with_postgresql83 with_postgresql84 \
> +    description {support for PostgreSQL 9.0.x} {
> +     configure.cppflags-append       "-I${prefix}/include/postgresql90"
> +     depends_lib-append      port:postgresql90
> +     configure.args-delete   --without-postgres
> +     configure.args-append   --with-postgres=${prefix}/lib/postgresql90
> +}
> +
> +variant without_bdb \
> +    description {remove support for Berkeley DB} {
> +     configure.args-delete   --with-bdb=${prefix}
> +     configure.args-append   --without-bdb
> +}

We no longer want variant names starting with "with_", "without_", "no_", etc. 
These variants should be called "mysql5", "postgresql83", "postgresql84", 
"postgresql90" and "bdb", respectively. The bdb variant's functionality would 
be the reverse of what you currently have in the without_bdb variant. And you'd 
then make bdb a default variant with:

default_variants +bdb

And to keep everything related to bdb together, the "if" statement stuff from 
above that sets the bdb dependency should be inside the new bdb variant.


> +post-activate {
> +    system "${prefix}/bin/gtk-update-icon-cache -f -t 
> ${prefix}/share/icons/hicolor"
> +}

If it's important to update the icon cache after activation, is it also 
important to do so after deactivation? (I'm not sure, just asking.)



_______________________________________________
macports-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/macports-dev

Reply via email to