On Nov 23, 2011, at 01:45, Jeremy Huddleston wrote: > On Nov 4, 2011, at 10:12 AM, Jeremy Huddleston wrote: > >> On Nov 4, 2011, at 1:18 AM, Michael Feiri wrote: >> >>> One thing I'd like to do while these ports are still "in the making" is to >>> adjust the names to follow our usual scheme for versioned ports, e.g. >>> gcc46, python27, scala29, etc. >> >> Ok, go ahead. Sooner rather than later is better. > > Since Michael never did this, and these ports have been there a while, I'm > guessing we should just keep these. I personally never liked the naming > without the "-", so I'm glad to be ditching that. The lack of - and . > characters makes those port names ambiguous.
Well the vast majority of existent versioned ports are named without dash and dot, so it would be more consistent to continue that tradition. I have not had a chance to try these llvm ports with pure; I'll try to do that soon. It's meant to be compatible with llvm 2.9 and 3.0. _______________________________________________ macports-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/macports-dev
