On Dec 1, 2011, at 16:34, [email protected] wrote: > Revision: 87705 > http://trac.macports.org/changeset/87705 > Author: [email protected] > Date: 2011-12-01 14:34:36 -0800 (Thu, 01 Dec 2011) > Log Message: > ----------- > libwnck: update to version 2.30.7.
> -checksums md5 323127c546d4b6796ae569f3da0892ab \ > - sha1 a7ef8842f85249878fd0389ae6c1b303d41e9623 \ > - rmd160 d9c228bfe1257de9b1b1e8a3fc3b8c38d6e665d9 > +checksums sha256 > 8be84d5333f0ade0e61af9f4cbf7685cb7cce2aa0ee32f53bac32107a81fe194 Remember that we do still want to list two different checksum types for each distfile. sha256 may be considered a secure algorithm today, but by using two different checksum types for each file, we ensure that if ever one of the algorithms becomes known to be insecure in the future, we won't have a problem. _______________________________________________ macports-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/macports-dev
