On Nov 28, 2011, at 08:47, [email protected] wrote:
> Revision: 87607
> http://trac.macports.org/changeset/87607
> Author: [email protected]
> Date: 2011-11-28 06:47:20 -0800 (Mon, 28 Nov 2011)
> Log Message:
> -----------
> mecab, mecab-sjis, mecab-utf8: fix distfiles.
>
> Modified Paths:
> --------------
> trunk/dports/textproc/mecab/Portfile
> trunk/dports/textproc/mecab-sjis/Portfile
> trunk/dports/textproc/mecab-utf8/Portfile
>
> Modified: trunk/dports/textproc/mecab/Portfile
> ===================================================================
> --- trunk/dports/textproc/mecab/Portfile 2011-11-28 14:42:42 UTC (rev
> 87606)
> +++ trunk/dports/textproc/mecab/Portfile 2011-11-28 14:47:20 UTC (rev
> 87607)
> @@ -18,7 +18,7 @@
> This port depends on MeCab base analyzer and a Japanese \
> dictionary of ${encoding} encoding.
>
> -distfiles
> +distfiles {}
In what way were distfiles broken before this change? I've put the line
"distfiles" into many portfiles (to prevent them from having any distfiles) but
I've never used "distfiles {}". I wouldn't think there would be a difference
however.
_______________________________________________
macports-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/macports-dev
