On Jan 12, 2012, at 01:14, Jeremy Huddleston wrote: > Crap, I meant this commit to be just the llvm changes. The gcc changes were > intended to be a separate commit, so I'm following up to the mailing list. > > gcc4[567]: Pass --enable-lto to configure to enable LTO > gcc46: Bump epoch, which should've been done with r83578 > > > On Jan 11, 2012, at 11:11 PM, [email protected] wrote: > >> Revision >> 88802 >> Author >> [email protected] >> Date >> 2012-01-11 23:11:19 -0800 (Wed, 11 Jan 2012) >> Log Message >> >> {llvm,clang,dragonegg}-3.1: Bump to r147925 >> Modified Paths >> >> • trunk/dports/lang/clang-3.1/Portfile >> • trunk/dports/lang/dragonegg-3.1/Portfile >> • trunk/dports/lang/gcc45/Portfile >> • trunk/dports/lang/gcc46/Portfile >> • trunk/dports/lang/gcc47/Portfile >> • trunk/dports/lang/llvm-3.1/Portfile >> Diff >> >> Modified: trunk/dports/lang/clang-3.1/Portfile (88801 => 88802) >>
>> --- trunk/dports/lang/gcc46/Portfile 2012-01-12 05:23:04 UTC (rev 88801) >> +++ trunk/dports/lang/gcc46/Portfile 2012-01-12 07:11:19 UTC (rev 88802) >> >> @@ -4,8 +4,8 @@ >> >> PortGroup select 1.0 >> >> >> >> name gcc46 >> >> +epoch 1 >> >> version 4.6.2 >> >> -revision 3 But the revision should not be removed, for one reason because the epoch is not included in the name of archives. This means that now users will be downloading (epoch 0) 4.6.2_0 from the package server, which is much older. The revision should now be bumped to 4. _______________________________________________ macports-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/macports-dev
