On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 11:41, Jeremy Lavergne <[email protected]> wrote: > > The "default" version that zmq would depend on could be a subport of the port > it depends on, no? That'll make it easier to just move a line or two from the > "default" portfile.
True, I was avoiding getting too far into implementation; trying to stay at the hierarchy level. On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 11:59, Ryan Schmidt <[email protected]> wrote: > > We shouldn't repeat the "perl5" antipattern any further. Perl should have > been using "port select" all along; I don't know why it never did. > > However, there is talk of offering only perl 5.14 and deleting the others, so > changes to the perl selection mechanism should perhaps wait until a decision > on that is reached. That's why I left it at "as with perl currently". I probably should have just left that option off entirely, given what's been discussed. -- arno s hautala /-| [email protected] pgp b2c9d448 _______________________________________________ macports-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/macports-dev
