On Mar 25, 2012, at 21:46, Jeffrey Johnson wrote: >>> and a path-based depends_lib like before is appropriate >> >> A path:-based depends_lib would be ok. a lib:-based depends_lib is not ok >> because that would allow a non-MacPorts librpm installed in a system >> directory to satisfy the dependency, and we don't want that. >> > > Again you are reacting to a non-existent fact: > There is no librpm.dylib being installed.
If no librpm.dylib is installed, the dependency on "lib:librpm:rpm" makes no sense. _______________________________________________ macports-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/macports-dev
