At 7:56 AM -0500 4/6/12, Jeremy Lavergne wrote:
> Just curious, why two checkums? Is one not sufficient?
Here we go again :-)
I'm not trying to pick a scab. Just found it curious when I was
working on a portfile that both were recommended without offering any
reasons why.
Hadn't thought about malicious alteration of the distfiles. I
presumed it was to detect garbled transmission.
Craig
_______________________________________________
macports-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/macports-dev