On 2012-4-9 20:49 , Rainer Müller wrote: > On 2012-04-08 21:35 , Jack Howarth wrote: >> Also non-sensical values like... >> >> sudo port -d install pymol +gcc49 >> >> don't produce an error. Is that expected behavior for the error to be >> silently ignored by port? > > Variants are being passed down to dependencies. It could well be that > this variant specification was intended for another port in the > dependency chain. Therefore it's not an error that this variant is not > provided by the specified port.
<https://trac.macports.org/ticket/14648> It should ideally warn if nothing in the chain provides that variant, but that's not straightforward to implement. - Josh _______________________________________________ macports-dev mailing list macports-dev@lists.macosforge.org http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/macports-dev
