% otool -L /opt/local/lib/libQtCore.4.7.4.dylib /opt/local/lib/libQtCore.4.7.4.dylib: /opt/local/lib/libQtCore.4.dylib (compatibility version 4.7.0, current version 4.7.4)
No rev bumps required until qt5. (Unless they've seriously messed up their library versioning, which I doubt.) - Josh On 2012-4-13 23:46 , Michael Dickens wrote: > Actually, the primary installed library names are changing (from, > e.g., libQtCore.4.7.4.dylib to libQtCore.4.8.1.dylib) and then the rest > are just soft links to this file. Hence, depending on how the dependent > project is linked, it may or not require a rev bump. So, doing the > revupgrade_mode seems like it would be wise, and I'll do so once I get > to that point; hopefully later today, but we'll see. I remember the last > time there was a major update to Qt, and the revision changes were quite > the PITA; we do what we have to do :) - MLD > > On Apr 13, 2012, at 9:40 AM, Joshua Root wrote: >> If the linking will be broken, revisions still need to be incremented. >> You can use rev-upgrade to help with this: setting 'revupgrade_mode >> report' in macports.conf will make it show you all the installed ports >> that are broken but not rebuild them. (I'd recommend this mode for >> developers so you're prompted to rev bump ports that need it.) >> >> However, it doesn't look like the soname is changing, so are you certain >> that rebuilding is necessary? >> >> - Josh _______________________________________________ macports-dev mailing list macports-dev@lists.macosforge.org http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/macports-dev