On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 10:11:12PM +0200, vincent habchi wrote: > On 19 avr. 2012, at 22:07, Jack Howarth <howa...@bromo.med.uc.edu> wrote: > > > On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 09:47:13PM +0200, vincent habchi wrote: > >> Folks, > >> > >> What about the upcoming LLD? > >> > >> Vincent > > If lld is the proposed replacement for the existing ld linker tool, what > > is proposed as the replacement assmebler for compilers outside of clang? > > llvm-mc?
But will llvm-mc pretend to be gas (like clang pretends to be gcc) in terms of understanding option flags and such so that it can be a drop in replacement for the current 'as'? > > Vincent _______________________________________________ macports-dev mailing list macports-dev@lists.macosforge.org http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/macports-dev
