On Apr 29, 2012, at 17:59, Joshua Root wrote: > On 2012-4-30 08:30 , Ryan Schmidt wrote: >> >> On Apr 29, 2012, at 17:18, [email protected] wrote: >> >>> Revision: 92477 >>> https://trac.macports.org/changeset/92477 >>> Author: [email protected] >>> Date: 2012-04-29 15:18:51 -0700 (Sun, 29 Apr 2012) >>> Log Message: >>> ----------- >>> pianobar: don't create a second port with the same name >> >> I've already explained why I find it useful to do so, and I've yet to >> understand what problems doing so causes. Someone said portindex failure but >> I've never seen that. > > As we told you before: > <https://trac.macports.org/ticket/33773>
I hadn't seen that ticket before. > I see pure-mode.el for example is also not in the index. Ok, I see what you mean. When I tested locally, before a port was added (or before its subports were added), I would use e.g. "sudo port install subport=pure-mode.el" so I didn't notice that it wasn't in the index properly. I don't understand why this prevents the subports from getting indexed, but I guess it doesn't matter; I'll fix the ports. > Best case, the > port gets indexed twice when you do this (and built twice on the buildbot). Ok. I guess then we'll eventually have to find another way to indicate to users what ports/subports it makes sense to install and which ones it doesn't. _______________________________________________ macports-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/macports-dev
