On May 21, 2012, at 5:52 PM, [email protected] wrote:
> 
> nmap: update license now that OpenSSLException is an available choice
> 
> -#license             GPL-2
> -# GPL-2 plus OpenSSL exception is correct, but we can't express that
> -# be _careful_ not to include conflicting dependents
> -license              Copyleft
> 
> +license              {GPL-2 OpenSSLException}

I think that this is correct, but maybe there's a problem here?

./port_binary_distributable.tcl -v nmap
dependency 'apr' has license 'Apache-2' which conflicts with license 
'OpenSSLException' from 'nmap'

Should OpenSSLException really cause conflicts like this?

(of course, in this case, gpl-2 conflicts with apache-2 anyway). 

--
Daniel J. Luke                                                                  
 
+========================================================+                      
  
| *---------------- [email protected] ----------------* |                      
    
| *-------------- http://www.geeklair.net -------------* |                      
    
+========================================================+                      
  
|   Opinions expressed are mine and do not necessarily   |                      
    
|          reflect the opinions of my employer.          |                      
    
+========================================================+



_______________________________________________
macports-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/macports-dev

Reply via email to