On May 23, 2012, at 1:43 PM, Bjarne D Mathiesen wrote:

> Bradley Giesbrecht wrote:
>> 
>> On May 23, 2012, at 11:49 AM, Bjarne D Mathiesen wrote:
>> 
>>> Ryan is of the opnion that we transition _hard_ from 2.2.x to 2.4.x and
>>> don't look back at all.
>>> 
>>> Are there any outstanding stuff / ports that will have problems with the
>>> transition from 2.2.x to 2.4.2 before we do so ???
>> 
>> Apache2 violates mtree. This may be a good time to finally fix this.
> 
> I'm actually very satisfied with the current situation.
> So unless the hive-mind collectively decides otherwise, I'm not going to
> work on implementing this.

It's been brought up before. Something like this upgrade to 2.4 is likely the 
only time this layout can be improved.

http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.os.apple.macports.devel/4462/focus=4468
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.os.apple.macports.user/7154/focus=7160
There are more examples.

What is the argument for apache2 to continue violating mtree?

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

_______________________________________________
macports-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/macports-dev

Reply via email to