On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 04:04:35AM -0500, Ryan Schmidt wrote: > You would need to increase the port's revision so that it gets rebuilt > following this change.
No, the port previously failed to build. > However, the problem with this change is that it makes all the subports > conflict with one another. Yes. This port primarily installs a command-line tool and it is (in this case) more useful to have that installed with a reasonable name than to support multiple installations. It would probably be better named file-rename or something. Dan -- Dan R. K. Ports MIT CSAIL http://drkp.net/ _______________________________________________ macports-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/macports-dev
