On 2012-7-13 10:46 , Ryan Schmidt wrote:
> 
> On Jul 5, 2012, at 01:55, [email protected] wrote:
> 
>> Revision: 95076
>>          https://trac.macports.org/changeset/95076
>> Author:   [email protected]
>> Date:     2012-07-04 23:55:56 -0700 (Wed, 04 Jul 2012)
>> Log Message:
>> -----------
>> ripmime: add license
>>
>> Modified Paths:
>> --------------
>>    trunk/dports/mail/ripmime/Portfile
>>
>> Modified: trunk/dports/mail/ripmime/Portfile
>> ===================================================================
>> --- trunk/dports/mail/ripmime/Portfile       2012-07-05 06:54:32 UTC (rev 
>> 95075)
>> +++ trunk/dports/mail/ripmime/Portfile       2012-07-05 06:55:56 UTC (rev 
>> 95076)
>> @@ -6,6 +6,7 @@
>> version                      1.4.0.6
>> categories           mail
>> platforms            darwin
>> +license                     BSD-old
> 
> The correct license for this port seems to be "BSD". Its LICENSE file has 
> three clauses. We refer to the 3-clause and 2-clause versions of the BSD 
> license as "BSD". Only the ancient 4-clause BSD license is referred to as 
> "BSD-old". I changed it in r95447.

The important distinction is not exactly the number of clauses, but
rather the presence or absence of this clause:

3. All advertising materials mentioning features or use of this software
must display the following acknowledgement:
This product includes software developed by {{the organization}}.

BSD-old is actually pretty rare these days since UC rescinded this
clause on everything for which they own the copyright.

- Josh
_______________________________________________
macports-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macports-dev

Reply via email to