On 2012-7-20 13:25 , Jeremy Lavergne wrote: >> Ah, ok. Since the mismatch of variants were making a "hidden" variant doc in >> these ports, with the fact that users having selected the +docs variant >> would not get what they asked, I considered that it was worth a revbump. >> Sorry if that was wrong. > > I just consider it unnecessary because it's just documentation (rather than > functionality) for software that isn't always the fastest build (if the > archives aren't available for whatever set of variants were used).
I haven't looked at the details of this particular case, but please do think through whether a rev bump will actually help before doing one. For large ports, you are potentially wasting a lot of time and electricity for a lot of people, after all. If you're adding a variant for example, a rev bump isn't helpful because just upgrading won't add anything to the port, the user has to actually specify that they want the variant when they install. - Josh _______________________________________________ macports-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macports-dev
