On Aug 4, 2012, at 15:54, [email protected] wrote:

> Revision: 96217
>          https://trac.macports.org/changeset/96217
> Author:   [email protected]
> Date:     2012-08-04 13:54:26 -0700 (Sat, 04 Aug 2012)
> Log Message:
> -----------
> nasm: update to 2.10.03
> 
> Modified Paths:
> --------------
>    trunk/dports/lang/nasm/Portfile
> 
> Modified: trunk/dports/lang/nasm/Portfile
> ===================================================================
> --- trunk/dports/lang/nasm/Portfile   2012-08-04 20:43:34 UTC (rev 96216)
> +++ trunk/dports/lang/nasm/Portfile   2012-08-04 20:54:26 UTC (rev 96217)
> @@ -3,7 +3,7 @@
> PortSystem 1.0
> 
> name          nasm
> -version              2.10
> +version              2.10.03
> categories    lang
> platforms     darwin
> license               BSD
> @@ -23,8 +23,8 @@
> master_sites  ${homepage}pub/nasm/releasebuilds/${version}
> use_bzip2     yes
> 
> -checksums       rmd160  186de8594c334b02d16c248566e1b810bfe0b076 \
> -                sha256  
> 687aa1a69b78801b7d85ca2b7f1c73503eb5925b17f1ac243f61194023a89df1
> +checksums       sha1    78a8de9ba02da7c2ba8c583a57901ff6856ad6c6 \
> +                rmd160  eb7bc486c7ed3065da3b79594e121f2aa46d03e1

FYI we do prefer to use an rmd160/sha256 checksum pair so keep that in mind for 
future port updates.



_______________________________________________
macports-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macports-dev

Reply via email to