On 2012-08-15 16:41 , [email protected] wrote:
> Revision: 96620
>           https://trac.macports.org/changeset/96620
> Author:   [email protected]
> Date:     2012-08-15 07:41:40 -0700 (Wed, 15 Aug 2012)
> Log Message:
> -----------
> textmate2: update to 2012-08-14
> 
> Modified Paths:
> --------------
>     trunk/dports/editors/textmate2/Portfile
> 
> Modified: trunk/dports/editors/textmate2/Portfile
> ===================================================================
> --- trunk/dports/editors/textmate2/Portfile   2012-08-15 13:58:46 UTC (rev 
> 96619)
> +++ trunk/dports/editors/textmate2/Portfile   2012-08-15 14:41:40 UTC (rev 
> 96620)
> @@ -4,9 +4,9 @@
>  PortSystem              1.0
>  PortGroup               github 1.0
>  
> -github.setup            textmate textmate 
> 6be04585518f4700713d86fc63a2761149f36365
> +github.setup            textmate textmate 
> 61071c153dd393c38f7286822e345f16711fcdd1
>  version                 2.0
> -revision                2012081200
> +revision                2012081400

I think it would be better to incorporate the date into the version
number. The version field should indicate the upstream version used to
build this port, the revision field increases for each change to the
Portfile that affects the installed files.

Rainer
_______________________________________________
macports-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macports-dev

Reply via email to